« Sit Up Straight! Chair Evaluation from CrunchGear | Main | del.icio.us as retro-blogging »

January 09, 2007



No one ever said the Web was a logical place. :-) I think we can look back from the early Web on and see how there was indeed an initial rush to lock in users with registration and the initial business model rush was towards subscriptions. So as social network companies look for some business models beyond Google's Ad Sense, I don't think it is improbable to at least wonder about attempted proprietary lock-ins.

p.s. Happy New Year!

Mark, I'm not so sure. I didn't score that high on the LSAT, but the logic doesn't seem to be true. Is this like saying Yahoo had to keep everyone on the web looking exclusively at their website to be successful in the early days of the web? I agree you need good users, but why do you have to lock them in? Can't they just stop by when they want? Plus, my browser (Flock) keeps making it easier for me to participate in a large number of networks with very little effort. Is there a limit, sure, but my guess is that it is nowhere in sight.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Quoth she/he...

  • "The hallmark of revolution is that the goals of the revolutionaries cannot be contained by the institutional structure of the society they live in. As a result, either the revolutionaries are put down, or some of those institutions are transmogrified, replaced, or simply destroyed. We are plainly witnessing a restructuring of the music and newspaper businesses, but their suffering isn’t unique, it’s prophetic." --Clay Shirky

The Digested Digest

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 08/2003

stat counter

  • View My Stats