so after the USPTO has agreed to review ALL 44 claims of the blackboard patent, they decide MAYBE it would be good if they issued a wishy-washy pledge to not use whatever remains of their patent after that review to not sue open source software LMSs. Stephen Downes has it exactly, "It's a cynical ploy intended to divide its opponents. The appeal should be carried through. The patent should be invalidated. Blackboard's nonsensical case against Desire2Learn should be crushed."
Harold,
Powerful stand. I'd love it if IT guys from around the world decided that they would rather not fix any systems than ran bb, a nice little student boycott would be nice and top it all off with a number of administrators waking up and realizing that all this is really about giving them and their students less choice in the marketplace and NOT about building a better product.
Posted by: mark oehlert | February 05, 2007 at 08:13 AM
Who would they sue anyway - Source Forge? You can't sue a project, especially one that nobody owns. This is definitely an attempt to divide and conquer; a typical move by a typical corporation. All that the rest of us can do is keep their feet to the fire and ensure that the issue does not drop off the radar screen. Personally, I would rather not take a contract, lucrative as it may be, than work with a Blackboard installation.
Posted by: Harold Jarche | February 04, 2007 at 04:00 PM