Honestly, if you haven't heard the name Andrew Keen yet or heard the title of his recent screed, The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet is Killing our Culture" - count yourself lucky If you have the stomach for it, he does publish an excerpt of his book on his site). I'm sorry to bring up this bad piece of flawed logic and sloppy writing but just as surely as I was one of the ones named by Time as Person of the Year, then I am just as surely one of the ones Keen feels is destroying our culture and I feel some small obligation to join my fellow amateurs in railing against this bad, bad book and by doing so, I'm sure, confirm some of Keen's worst fears and probably but some poor critic out of a job somewhere.
Here is what Keen sees when he looks at the Internet "I mostly see cultural and ethical chaos. I see the eruption of rampant intellectual property theft, extreme pornography, sexual promiscuity, plagiarism, gambling, contempt for order, intellectual inanity, crime, a culture of anonymity, hatred toward authority, incessant spam, and a trash heap of user-generated-content (whew, what a mouthful!). I see a chaotic humans arrangement with few, if any, formal social pacts." The blogosphere is an "echo chamber of digital narcissism." That is a dark world that Keen lives in isn't it?
Want to know what can fix such a horrible thing? Keen is ready with "we need laws, a series of social contracts, to constructively regulate our behavior on the Internet."
But what Keen really wants is for the VAST majority of us to just shut the hell up..."And we must (re)learn the ability to be silent, to listen to others
more learned than ourselves, to value the wisdom of the expert." Here is the heart of Keen...we are killing of all the experts - I wonder if Keen read this article from the Onion and thought it was real? Or maybe this piece of fictional legislation is what he really pines for.
I really want to tear into this myself but being an amateur...I'll just toss it to the pros.
From the professional New Statesman: "Many of Keen's gripes in The Cult of the Amateur are
reasonable; but, like his target, they dissolve in a miasma of
polemical generalisation and frenzied verbiage. There is no irony in
his use of phrases such as "deviant instincts", "intellectual
kleptomaniacs" and "the disappearance of truth". It is as though
postmodernism, let alone poststructuralism, never happened. Sometimes
his soundbites are deeply amusing in their unintended perversity. I
particularly liked the reference to Jorge Luis Borges, rendered simply
as "a half-blind Argentine" (one who - Keen would have done well to
remember - claimed that "to speak is to fall into tautology")."
...and from the professional professor and noted lawyer Lawrence Lessig (hmmm, Keen has neither a professorship nor a law degree - it would seem then by his own argument he should shut his flapping pie hole and "listen to others
more learned than ourselves"): "But what is puzzling about this book is that it purports to be a book
attacking the sloppiness, error and ignorance of the Internet, yet it
itself is shot through with sloppiness, error and ignorance. It tells
us that without institutions, and standards, to signal what we can
trust (like the institution (Doubleday) that decided to print his
book), we won’t know what’s true and what’s false. But the book itself
is riddled with falsity — from simple errors of fact, to gross
misreadings of arguments, to the most basic errors of economics."
Almost forgot to include another great review by Clay Shirky..."The hallmark of revolution is that the goals of the revolutionaries
cannot be contained by the institutional structure of the society they
live in. As a result, either the revolutionaries are put down, or some
of those institutions are transmogrified, replaced, or simply
destroyed. We are plainly witnessing a restructuring of the music and
newspaper businesses, but their suffering isn’t unique, it’s prophetic."